1. Nominalisation of Verbs๏
In scientific writing, actions (processes) are often rewritten as things (participants).
1.1. Process โ Participant๏
This table has a process only (a single verb).
Verb (Action) |
-ing Ending (Less Formal) |
-ation / Technical Ending (More Formal) |
|---|---|---|
Condense |
Condensing |
Condensation |
Evaporate |
Evaporating |
Evaporation |
Filter |
Filtering |
Filtration |
Beyond the standard -ing and -ation suffixes, science often uses more irregular nominalisation shifts to turn processes into participants.
Verb (Process) |
-ing Ending (Less Formal) |
Formal Technical Noun |
|---|---|---|
Erode |
Eroding |
Erosion |
Erupt |
Erupting |
Eruption |
Absorb |
Absorbing |
Absorption |
Evolve |
Evolving |
Evolution |
Reproduce |
Reproducing |
Reproduction |
Expand |
Expanding |
Expansion |
Diffuse |
Diffusing |
Diffusion |
Compress |
Compressing |
Compression |
Divide |
Dividing |
Division |
Grow |
Growing |
Growth |
Warm |
Warming |
Warmth |
Weigh |
Weighing |
Weight |
This table begins with a participant + process (a noun + verb), forming a full clause.
Everyday (process) |
Scientific (participant) |
|---|---|
Plates collide |
The collision of plates |
Crust spreads |
The spreading of crust |
Plates converge |
The convergence of plates |
In SFL terms:
Verbs realise processes
Nominalisations realise participants
This allows processes to be treated as things
1.2. Why science uses this pattern๏
Turning processes into participants allows scientists to:
explain cause and effect
compare processes
build chains of reasoning
write more formally and precisely
Purpose |
Everyday clause (process as verb) |
Scientific clause (process as participant) |
|---|---|---|
Explain cause and effect |
Plates collide, forming mountains. |
The collision of plates forms mountains. |
Write more formally and precisely |
VOlcanos erupt suddenly, causing earthquakes. |
The sudden eruption of volcanoes causes earthquakes. |